Bitdefender vs Kalspersky

Like we said and what all other users say, the comparisons between BitDefender vs Kalspersky can be easy to spot.

Yet, when it comes to sticking to one, the BitDefender vs Kalspersky issue can be hard to resolve.

For many independent antivirus-testing centers, BitDefender and Kalspersky consistently take the number 1 and 2 spots, or vice-versa. BitDefender and Kalspersky are seemingly in a tight race at the lead spots in the antivirus markets. Both have a loyal following, and both have boatloads of features that will make every geek drool.

There are many customizable options and for regular users who are not much into tweaking computer settings, the basic user interface is simple and understandable. Both products are “install and forget” programs, leaving users free to do important matters other than always configuring their antivirus software.

There are other useful and important features that each antivirus product shares. Both of their antivirus engines are ICSA certified. Both offer the same roster of scanning capabilities, such as script blocking, quarantine, auto-cleaning, IM protection, peer-to-peer protection protocols, on-demand scanning, heuristic scanning, on-access scanning, and detailed virus profiles, among others. Depending on the versions and customization, both can be configured to update its virus list on an hourly basis, or at a preset schedule.

With the question of BitDefender vs Kalspersky, we might have to look at their additional offerings. There are slight differences in the auxiliary packages that they are manufactured with. One is that BitDefender has a particular antivirus product more suited for small businesses with small to medium sized networks. It also has a GameSafe package, which is designed for gamers who want to keep their gaming rigs safe but at the same time do not want the resident antivirus to be interfering with their gaming sessions.

Similarly, Kaspersky has a unique antivirus package meant specifically for file servers and related network servers. These include a Kaspersky product for mail servers, an antivirus package for Internet gateways, and other Kaspersky packages that are tailor-made for each business size.

In many instances, BitDefender is rated number 1 across the board. In many tests, AV reviewers claim that BitDefender edged out Kaspersky on many factors, but only just a little bit. For example, BitDefender was the winner in scanning speed, but just a few seconds faster than Kaspersky. Others unofficially place Kaspersky ahead of BitDefender, simply because it found malware that BitDefender did not locate.

Many users of the antivirus tools who congregate in product info forums have also raised similar questions between BitDefender vs Kalspersky. Both have conflicting claims against each antivirus product, with one group claiming that BitDefender has not detected this and that, while the other group claiming total effectiveness of its scanning machines. Some users also find Kaspersky to be slower than BitDefender, while other users found no problems whatsoever with Kaspersky.

Confusing, isn’t it? What we have to know is that every antivirus reacts and works differently (on some machines, significantly) on many different machine platforms. These are caused by a number of factors, chief of which are the nature of the machine, the exact specifications and resources available in a computer, and the quantity and the kind of programs that are run simultaneously with the antivirus.

In the end though, testing out the antivirus for yourself is the only sure thing to reach a decision between BitDefender vs Kalspersky. Because they react differently on many computers, it is probably better to find out which antivirus suits your computers and your needs best.