BitDefender vs Kaspersky

The question of superiority on the issue of BitDefender vs Kaspersky is admittedly a tricky one since both of the popular antivirus software consistently rank high on independent testers’ charts.

Of the many online forums you will visit, most hardcore and casual users of antivirus software repeatedly pit BitDefender vs Kaspersky much like an upcoming boxing match between two top fistic fighters.

In fact, there is a good chance you might refer to it as the BitDefender vs Kaspersky wars. They are both very good and very accomplished antivirus applications in their own right, and deal with viruses and other malware very effectively. They have their own unique and proprietary scan techniques and machines, and both scan for viruses very quickly. In fact, both antivirus programs race toe-to-toe on scan speeds with different testing institutions. Yet, overall, both of them are continually in the top 10 or top 3 lists.

Users on both sides of the seeming war tend to have conflicting claims about BitDefender vs Kaspersky and most of these claims will send the average user running for the hills, unable to determine what the real deal is. Some argue that BitDefender is faster and runs leaner on an adequately resourced machine, while some believe that Kaspersky records faster scanning time.

Some assert the total effectiveness of BitDefender’s heuristic scanning analyzers, while others are drawn towards Kaspersky’s strongest point: its ardent and constant updating activity from their own virus database centers. Some are turned away by BitDefender’s sluggishness while scanning, yet others are disappointed by the same observation found in Kaspersky’s.

No wonder ordinary antivirus users are left scratching their heads as they leave the forums.

Perhaps we may not be able to resolve this intractable problem. We may probably settle for the win-win advice: either product should work very well on your personal computer. We also have to note that many users tend to perceive problems with their antivirus machines and not knowing that it has caused conflicts with other programs, or that their systems are too cluttered and loaded with unnecessary self-running programs that the antivirus application itself is contributing to the overall problem.

It would do well for the computer user to know that every system has its own quirks and flavors, depending on how it was used prior to installation. Generally, a leaner and lightly used system will make the antivirus program run smooth and flawless, since it does not have any competition when using system resources. Antivirus programs are, in themselves, hogs of CPU resources because of the nearly constant operation of their firewall modules, and the periodic updates of virus databases and scheduled scanning procedures.

Another problem to consider is the overall effectiveness of the two antivirus applications. In order to solve the dilemma between BitDefender vs Kaspersky, a prospective buyer must take into account the strength and speed of their scanning engines. BitDefender runs a virtual machine when it scans for viruses and adding a security layer to the computer’s operations, systematically running program bits and trying to find out malware-like tendencies in the code. Kaspersky is also quite effective mainly because of a huge virus database which updates many times in a day, and which individual Kaspersky programs rely on heavily.

Finally, the issue of BitDefender vs Kaspersky might be truly resolved by testing out the antivirus programs themselves. This is where the free and trial versions of each antivirus tool come in.